|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
|
Possible Indicators |
Summary of the Framework
Additional Detail is available in the complete Chapter 2 of the SDI Report Excerpts from Chapter 2: Sustainable Development: A Working Definition and a Framework for Indicators of the SDI Report entitled: Sustainable Development in the United States, An Experimental Set of Indicators, December, 1998. 1. Definition of Sustainable Development: The SDI Group has developed a working definition of sustainable development and a conceptual framework for indicators of progress. The Group's discussions began with the definition of sustainable development proposed by the Brundtland Commission in 1987: which is, "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.".If we think of sustainable development as a three-legged stool, then one leg can be thought of as representing the economy, another as representing the environment, and the third as representing society or equity. If we achieve sustained progress in all three areas, then it is likely that we will leave the world in as good a state as the one we inherited, if not better. Concerns about job creation, economic growth, or investment have often been considered apart from concerns about environmental quality or education, with less than optimal results. For example, efforts to further economic growth in a particular geographical region without adequate consideration of the region's environment, natural resources, and social character may lead to urban sprawl, the disintegration of inner city neighborhoods, pollution, and/or the destruction of habitat. On the other hand, efforts to avoid any changes in natural habitat or the environment may hamper a region's ability to meet the economic and social needs of its residents. We frequently pay more attention to our wants and needs than we do to the potential long-term consequences of our actions. While we know that future development depends on having adequate assets and resources, concerns about the future often pale in comparison to immediate and pressing needs (e.g., for public safety or jobs). Consideration of the future becomes even more difficult when there are uncertainties about environmental trends, ecosystem carrying capacities, economic interactions, and future technological advances. A set of indicators that reflects today's conditions as well as the assets and liabilities we pass on to future generations can be an important tool in fostering integrated decision-making processes. The indicators selected by the SDI Group are based on data that are currently available, primarily from the Federal agencies.
2. Overview of the Framework: The SDI Framework organizes the indicators into three major categories representing (1) long-term endowments and liabilities, (2) processes, and (3) current results. These categories are then divided into subcategories for the economy, the environment, and society.
Figure 2.2. Sustainable Development Indicator Framework
As illustrated in Figure 2.2, sustainable development is not an end in itself, but rather an evolving process. All components of the Earth system--including human knowledge and technological development--are constantly changing, and in our effort to realize sustainable development, we must recognize and respond to these changes. In evaluating our progress, we can examine some of the parameters that appear to be most important today, even though these parameters are likely to change over time.
3. Major Categories of the Framework
a. Long-term Endowments and Liabilities
We inherit various assets, resources, and capacities from our predecessors, utilize some of them to meet our own needs and wants, and then pass them on to future generations. We also inherit a variety of challenges such as hazardous wastes, income disparity, and racial tensions that can carry over from generation to generation. Children can also be seen as another kind of endowment--one with very special characteristics--that is provided by each generation to the future. Indicators that reflect these long-term assets and challenges are labeled as "long-term endowments and liabilities" in the SDI Framework. These indicators are especially important in assessing sustainability since they emphasize the need to consider the impacts of current actions on the well-being of future generations.
As an analogy, one can think about the endowment of a university as the long-term capital base that the university needs to ensure adequate funding for current operations. This endowment must be maintained to provide the income the university needs for the future. Indicators of long-term endowments and liabilities reflect the legacy we pass on to the next generation.
In the SDI Framework, general processes include (1) the human activities that utilize endowments to yield current goods and services; (2) natural Earth system processes (e.g., hydrological, atmospheric, terrestrial, biological, or chemical); and (3) social, cultural, or political processes. Processes can include things as diverse as manufacturing, atmosphere/ocean interactions, and democratic governing processes.
These processes give rise to a number of driving forces--both desirable and undesirable--that directly affect the status of long-term endowments. For example, the industrial production of paper is a process that provides paper for consumers and jobs for some workers (current results), while also giving rise to the harvesting of timber and the release of chemicals (driving forces) that could affect the long-term status of forested and aquatic ecosystems (endowments).
Many of the general processes are affected by decision-making processes of government, industry, communities, and individuals. Decision-making includes things such as law-making, regulating, developing policies and management approaches, and evaluating consumer choices. Decision-making is guided by information--such as that provided by indicators--about current results, driving forces, and endowments.
In the SDI Framework, current results include the goods, services, and conditions that are enjoyed or experienced by present generations. Indicators of current results focus on human well-being today and in the near-term. Many of the indicators with which we are most familiar--such as the gross domestic product, unemployment rates, or crime rates--are indicators of current results.
Table 2.1. Major Framework Categories
d. Inclusion of Indicators in Categories: The inclusion of an indicator in a particular category or subcategory of the SDI Framework depends to some extent on the questions one asks. For example, an indicator on population could be categorized as an endowment in the sense that it reflects workforce capabilities or as a current result in the sense that it reflects current conditions. Another indicator such as income distribution, which is categorized in this document as an economic indicator, could also be categorized as a social indicator since it is so closely connected to a number of societal issues.
At this point, the SDI Framework should be viewed as an experimental tool. In the coming months, the SDI Group will begin to explore how the framework might be made more useful, and outside comments and suggestions would be welcomed.
| ||||||||||||||||
|
|